Charlie Jade Episode 116 Commentary: The Shortening of The Way

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 46:45 — 42.6MB)

Featuring commentary by Alex Epstein on Episode 116, “The Shortening of The Way”.

Originally aired Space on 07/23/2005 in Canada, aired on SciFi Channel on 09/23/2008 in the USA.

Charlie Jade recap: “The Shortening of the Way” | Pop Critics - Movies|TV|Comics|Music|Reviews|Recaps says:

September 23, 2008 at 1:01 am

[…] those were dropped on the floor during production of the episode. Check out Alex Epstein’s podcast commentary for this week’s episode for much more about the many […]

Reply
Charlie Jade recap: “The Shortening of the Way” | dreamloom says:

March 15, 2009 at 12:27 am

[…] those were dropped on the floor during production of the episode. Check out Alex Epstein’s podcast commentary for this week’s episode for much more about the many […]

Reply

Exact matches only

Search in title

Search in content

Search in excerpt

Hidden

Dontik on Charlie Jade Recap: “Ouroboros”: “Hi You should check the season 2 blueprint, which is available here somewhere 🙂 Also there’s an audio commentary for…”
Glitch on Charlie Jade Recap: “Ouroboros”: “I would like to know the significance of Jade and 01 transfusing at the end. Not much in the way…”
Summer Brooks on “Charlie Jade” now on Hulu: “Awesome, thanks for the heads-up! Posted the info to Twitter via @sliceofscifi”
Ken B on “Charlie Jade” now on Hulu: “Hey all! Just wanted to let you all know Amazon has the full season to stream right now. Dec of…”
James on “Charlie Jade” now on Hulu: “I just started watching Charlie Jade on Hulu a few weeks ago. Today it is expired, and we only got…”
CELINE DESANTIS on “Charlie Jade” Airing Again On Syfy Channel: “Hi Summer: Love the show and the love that you put into the website. I wish there was away to…”
CELINE DESANTIS on Charlie Jade Recap: “Betrayal”: “Summer: Thanks so much for keeping the show alive. It is not only a gem of the sci-fi genre, it…”
Summer Brooks on Charlie Jade Recap: “Betrayal”: “Interesting, since the link you have has always been the correct link… I wonder if that link in RA’s article…”

Reader Interactions